[Fts-research] Update

[Nicole Corporate Watch]

awesome thanks so much!


On 26/06/2019 15:20, Annie wrote:
> p.s.
> I just uploaded loads of articles in all the different sections of the
> research folder on the FTS cloud, so maybe you can find some useful
> information there!
> On 2019-06-26 16:04, Annie wrote:
>> Hey!
>>
>> Ok nice.
>>
>> Yes there is some information on the ASEED website, some on the FTS
>> cloud in the Alternatives folder. But then also I have some stuff on
>> my computer here, maybe I can upload that onto the cloud, or I can try
>> to write something and send it over in line with your subheadings.
>> Although sounds like you also have some interesting sources to tap
>> into.
>>
>> Definitely up for giving feedback and contributions once your skeleton
>> is up and running.
>>
>> Thanks Nicole!
>>
>> Annie
>>
>>
>> On 2019-06-26 15:49, Nicole Corporate Watch wrote:
>>> Hey!
>>>
>>> Yes I am using the research already undertaken in the company
>>> profiling document :) I am happy to do a lot of the work but it would
>>> be great to have feedback and contributions once the 'skeleton' is
>>> ready.
>>>
>>> That would be great to have your existing info on alternatives! Is
>>> that on the ASEED website? I also have a lot of existing agroecology
>>> resources I can use for this too.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the feedback about the structure, I will integrate that
>>> now!
>>>
>>> That's great about the lobbying stuff already being covered.
>>>
>>> Big thanks,
>>>
>>> Nicole
>>>
>>> On 26/06/2019 13:50, Annie wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Nicole,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for all this, it is looking great with lots of really
>>>> important points to cover. Do you want to divide the work /
>>>> subsections up slightly between the people on this list? It looks
>>>> like a lot of things to be covered by you, although maybe there are
>>>> more people planning to work on it at Corporate Watch? Also some of
>>>> the information you can just take from the company file you can find
>>>> on the cloud as some of the points are covered in that document. And
>>>> also with the alternatives, we have information within ASEED that we
>>>> could share with you so that you don't have to do the same work
>>>> twice!
>>>>
>>>> My main point about the order of the subsections is that I would
>>>> move the "Controversy" section to the bottom or before the
>>>> alternatives. Of course it is important to know what kind of
>>>> controversies Yara has been involved in and also shows how
>>>> despicable these multinational corporations can be, but I think we
>>>> need to have the main focus on Yara and it's affect on climate
>>>> change, threat to food security, greenwashing etc which you cover
>>>> after the point about "Controversy". It feels like the point of the
>>>> Free the Soil campaign is to highlight Yara in relation to its
>>>> impact on climate change throught the production of synthetic
>>>> nitrogen fertilizer and and the fact that no one knows this, so this
>>>> should continue to be our focus. However, I do like your idea to
>>>> make a map of all these controversies to show visually where Yara is
>>>> and where people could potentially do local decentralised actions.
>>>>
>>>> The other thing is now we have had contact with Belen and Pascoe
>>>> from Corporate Europe Observatory and they will most probably write
>>>> something on EU lobbying so it would be good not to overlap.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, let me know what you think to those comments. And thank you a
>>>> lot for the work you have done so far!
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Annie
>>>>
>>>> On 2019-06-26 13:14, Nicole Corporate Watch wrote:
>>>> Hey!
>>>>
>>>> Apologies, my research with this Gold Mining campaign has taken
>>>> longer
>>>> than expected.
>>>>
>>>> I have started to do some Yara research. So far, mapping the
>>>> controversies and making a directory that can accompany the article
>>>> with all the locations on one page in case of decentralised actions.
>>>> I
>>>> also did some shareholder research. I need to copy what I am doing
>>>> on
>>>> crabgrass into the cloud, I keep forgetting!
>>>>
>>>> I have attached an overview of the article I am planning to write.
>>>> It
>>>> will obviously be significantly larger than one blog post, so we are
>>>>
>>>> hoping to format it into a pdf/report that can be downloaded also.
>>>>
>>>> Can people take a look and give me feedback of what is missing? Is
>>>> it
>>>> what you were hoping for?
>>>>
>>>> Massive thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Nicole
>>>>
>>>> On 14/06/2019 08:07, Annie wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey Research team!
>>>>
>>>> How is everyone?
>>>>
>>>> Is anyone going to make it to the meeting this weekend? I cannot as
>>>> I have to work on the farm and no one can cover for me this
>>>> weekend!!
>>>>
>>>> I just sent an email to the fts list with a link to the company file
>>>>
>>>> about Yara that I uploaded onto the FTS cloud. This is a piece of
>>>> work from Flip, Katie, Jula and I who are based in the Netherlands.
>>>> It needs more work but at least I wanted to show that something has
>>>> been happening on the research side of things.
>>>>
>>>> Hope it goes well this weekend and hope to see you all soon if not
>>>> in September!
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Annie
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Fts-research mailing list
>>>> Fts-research at lists.tuxic.nl
>>>> https://lists.tuxic.nl/mailman/listinfo/fts-research
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Fts-research mailing list
>>>> Fts-research at lists.tuxic.nl
>>>> https://lists.tuxic.nl/mailman/listinfo/fts-research
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fts-research mailing list
>> Fts-research at lists.tuxic.nl
>> https://lists.tuxic.nl/mailman/listinfo/fts-research

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tuxic.nl/pipermail/fts-research/attachments/20190626/c3dff722/attachment.html>